Extractions and briefs are only as good as the process behind them. We re-examine the source data, verify hashes and timestamps, authenticate screenshots against original messages, and identify what a selective production has left out — frequently changing the complexion of a matter.
The biggest driver of eDiscovery cost is over-collection. We scope custodians, date ranges and search terms up front, cull defensibly, and document every decision so the process itself survives challenge.
Often not. Review of existing extractions, briefs and productions requires only the material itself. Where the review shows gaps, we advise on what further evidence to seek.
Yes. Review engagements are routinely conducted under privilege, and our involvement need not be disclosed unless you choose to rely on our findings.
Standard court-ready formats including load files for common review platforms, indexed PDF productions and native-with-metadata productions, to the protocol agreed between the parties.